Jump to content
Lex

BMW E46 3.0CS - project. *new pics

Recommended Posts

Looks MUCH better without the stickers!! :thumbsup:

Any plans for lowering?

I'm keeping it standard apart from some subtle mods, the ride it's perfect now, lowering will just make my daily drive around London a pain...

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks MUCH better without the stickers!! :thumbsup:

Any plans for lowering?

I'm keeping it standard apart from some subtle mods, the ride it's perfect now, lowering will just make my daily drive around London a pain...

:lol:

Tesco fault, not mine...

That's how a good shopping day looks when you have 255 and 15mm spacers on standard clubsport suspension, I don't want to think what would happen if it was lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got the car lowered by 10mm... but also 10mm more of arch gap on front :cry:

At least handles awesome now :thumbup:

20150606_163534_zpsnqsckfxt.jpg

20150607_194449_zpsebxjjsqe.jpg

Edited by Lex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How have you lowered it just 10mm? Spring cups?

Using low profile tires :punk:

The car feels much better with 225 instead of 255 imo, I know the 255 is the OEM size, but sticks to roads like it's glued... to much grip isn't good sometimes.

11304517_668668589931241_1920768711_n_zp

Edited by Lex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exact profiles are you running to lose 10mm in height?

Basically if we're looking at the photo, it's 20mm in total, but that splits in 2, 10mm of arch gap and 10mm lowering the car, I wasn't planning to do this, I just seen after checking the sizes.

From 225/40 to 215/35, that's dropping from 637mm to 607mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear lord....

What? The wheels look already small by their design, using big tires on them looks even worse, now looks just perfect imo, also I have more space now for lowering in future if I want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah bmw messed up didn't they, they obviously should have fitted those size tyres from factory . I know when I fitted 215/35 tyres on 18" rims it drove horrible as theres hardly any 'give' in the sidewall.

You've said your self you ain't lowering the car due to the fact it suits your needs being at standard ride height, so you've basically just made it look a bit odd, as there's now a massive arch gap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah bmw messed up didn't they, they obviously should have fitted those size tyres from factory . I know when I fitted 215/35 tyres on 18" rims it drove horrible as theres hardly any 'give' in the sidewall.

You've said your self you ain't lowering the car due to the fact it suits your needs being at standard ride height, so you've basically just made it look a bit odd, as there's now a massive arch gap

The rear sits much better now imo, the front needs a bit lower, will see what I can do about ^_^

PS: I had arch gap before too, as it's standard I think is something normal.

10156162_667414083390025_630268164874227

Edited by Lex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear lord....

What? The wheels look already small by their design, using big tires on them looks even worse, now looks just perfect imo, also I have more space now for lowering in future if I want to.

If you lower it on the original tyres it would look fine. I agree with Jay that profile has not much give and you have more chance of buckling the wheel. The money you spent on buying new tyres could have gone to a set of either springs or coilovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you lower it on the original tyres it would look fine. I agree with Jay that profile has not much give and you have more chance of buckling the wheel. The money you spent on buying new tyres could have gone to a set of either springs or coilovers.

I don't see what's wrong with 35 profile, there are thousands using the same on 18", they look clearly better as it's giving a bit of stretch.

It's not looking bad now, but I will try some springs to see the difference, if you look at the last photo, lowered looks perfect imo for standard wheels.

IMG_8171_zpszwywxblr.jpg

IMG_8168_zpsehq9opxa.jpg

5342523532-vert_zpso6yzyu5e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 profile looks better on 19" wheel. Of course if you got air than the 35profile looks awesome on 18s but on the standard wheel I would use /40, especially if it's a daily in London as you said:

"I'm keeping it standard apart from some subtle mods, the ride it's perfect now, lowering will just make my daily drive around London a pain..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mate, people use lower profiles to get away with lowering problems, clearing a 40 front profile on a front tyre on lock is a challenge, fitting a 35 profile over comes this.

the reasoning your using is absolute b0ll0x and it just looks at the moment like you couldn't afford the correct tyres & youv'e fitted any old rubbish they had down the part worn shop.

You've got a gorgeous example of a clubsport there, keep it subtle - either fit some suspension that justifies your tyre choice or leave it as it come from the factory.

All imho of course ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Jay, a lower profile would help with lowering/steering problems, if you wanted a slight stretch then a narrower tyre would achieve this but keeping the 40 profile. Personally i think the 35 profile is too small for the size of the arch. Josh has just brought 40 profile for his new 18" alloys with some stretch, he was previously on a 35 profile and stated that it was a bit of a bumpy ride.

It is a lovely example mate, don't get me wrong some eibach springs might help out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers guys for opinions, a bit of lowering would set it nice, think about that I've changed the 40 profile to 35 only on fronts, as the rear comes OEM with 35 profile, isn't a big deal tho', i bet none of you would see the difference without me mentioning the tire size.

I have good roads around, never had problems with pot holes, just few speedbumps in car parks or some streets, but that has nothing to do with tire profile.

Have a look at the photo bellow, 40 vs 35 profile, 99% of you wouldn't see the difference, so it can't look bad or worse ^_^ just a little bit more arch gap which I can get rid by using some lowering springs.

IMG_6736-horz_zpsgrdjfzsq.jpg

Edited by Lex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the others.

I don't see why you didn't just keep the stock profiles and lower it slightly. That way you'd have the same height you have now without the massive arch gap.

Its also worth mentioning that the rear comes with a 35 profile so that the overall diameter of the wheel / tyre is the same as the front. This is because the profile is proportional to the width of the tyre - rears being 255 and fronts being 225.

Edited by ben.embrey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the others.

I don't see why you didn't just keep the stock profiles and lower it slightly. That way you'd have the same height you have now without the massive arch gap.

Its also worth mentioning that the rear comes with a 35 profile so that the overall diameter of the wheel / tyre is the same as the front. This is because the profile is proportional to the width of the tyre - rears being 255 and fronts being 225.

Some of you like to exaggerate the things over the limit lmao, "massive arch gap"... oh cool, tell me how I have now a "massive arch gap" and before I didn't.

C'mon guys... get over it, i'm using 35 instead of 40, not killing anyone, also if it looks better imo, I don't see the problem, there are few other millions people running 35 on 18" on fronts, why don't you tell them the same thing?

Before and now... yeah I can see how massive my arch gap is now compared to before. :thumbup:

20150329_173853-vert_zps6jtlewdr.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now





×
×
  • Create New...